Genocide Denial under Constitutional Law: Comparative analysis of Spain, Germany and France

Authors

Abstract

This article examines Genocide denial under the constitutional law, mainly the conflict between constitutionally protected rights of freedom of speech and dignity/equality. The comparison reflects the attitudes of three European States – Germany, Spain and France. The Article discusses the history and background of anti-Holocaust laws in the concerned countries and possible criminalization of the Armenian Genocide denial. If further concentrated on the Constitutional Court decisions, which are marked with differences connected with factors such as history, morals, values of the particular society and, of course, politics.

Author Biography

Edita Gzoyan, Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute of NAS RA

Senior researcher at the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute. She has a PhD in International relations from Yerevan State University and LLM from American University of Armenia. She is an author of a monograph and nearly three dozens of articles related to legal, historical and gender aspects of the Armenian Genocide.

References

Mill John Stuart, “On Liberty,” cited in Claudia E. Haupt, “Regulating Hate Speech – Damned if You Do and Damned if You Don’t: Lessons Learned from Comparing the German and U.S. Approaches,” Boston University International Law Journal 23:299 (2005).

Bruce Ackerman, “The Marketplace of Ideas,” www.digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/154 (accessed 10 May, 2012).

Keith Werhan, Freedom of Speech: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution (Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 2004).

Alexander Meiklejohn, Free Speech and Its Relations to Self-Government (New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers, 1948).

Human Rights. Collection of regional international documents (Vilnius, 1993).

Alfonsas Vaišvila, “Human Dignity and the right to Human Dignity in terms of legal personalism, from conception of static dignity to conception of dynamic one,” Jurisprudencija 3:117(2009): 111-127, www.mruni.eu (accessed 10 May, 2012).

Michel Rosenfeld, “Hate Speech in the Constitutional Jurisprudence: A Comparative Analysis,” Cardozo Law Review 24: 4 (2003).

Kathleen Mahoney, “The Canadian Constitutional approach to Freedom of Expression in Hate Propaganda and Pornography,” Law and Contemporary Problems 55, 1 (1992).

Ruti Teitel, “Militating Democracy: Comparative Constitutional Perspectives,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 29:49(2008).

John Knechtle, “Holocaust Denial and the Concept of Dignity in the European Union,” Florida State University Law Review 36:41(2008).

Silvia Suteu, “Law against Negation: Anti-Holocaust Denial Legislations in Europe,” www.fromceu.hu (accessed 2 May, 2012).

B.H., M.W., H.P. et G.K. v. Austria, no. 1277/87, Commission decision of October 12, 1989. Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. Turkey, nos. 41340/98, 41342/98, 41343/98, 4144/98, 2003, para. 124.

“Introduction,” in Ludovic Hennebel and Tomas Hochmann (eds.), Genocide Denials and the Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).

Claus Leggewie, “Seven circles of European memory,” www.eurozine.com/pdf/2010-12-20-leggewie-en.pdf (accessed 25 April 2012).

Ian Traynor, “Germany bids to outlaw denial of Holocaust across continent,” www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jan/16/germany.thefarright (accessed 20 May, 2012).

Sionaidh Douglas-Scott, “The Hatefulness of Protected speech: A Comparison of American and European Approaches,” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 7(1999).

Laurent Pech, “The Law of Holocaust Denial in Europe: Towards a (Qualified) EU-wide Criminal Prohibition,” www.centers.law.nyu.edu/jeanmonnet/papers/09/091001.html (accessed 25 April 2012).

Mariana Mello, “Hagan v. Australia: A Sign of the Emerging Notion of Hate Speech in Customary International Law,” Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 28:365 (2006).

Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court] Apr. 13, 1994, 90 Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts [BVerfGE] 241 (F.R.G.), www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen.html (accessed 11 May 2012).

Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] [Federal Constitutional Court] Apr. 13, 1994.

Dieter Grimm, “The Holocaust Denial Decision of the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany,” in Ivan Hare, James Weinstein (eds.), Extreme Speech and Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).

BVerfG (2009), Wunsiedel, 1 BvR 2150/08, Par. 64-68.

Winfried Brugger, “Ban on or Protection of Hate Speech? Some Observations Based on German and American Law,” Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 17 (2002).

Ronald J. Krotoszynski, “A Comparative Perspective on the First Amendment: Free Speech, Militant Democracy, and the Primacy of Dignity as a Preferred Constitutional Value in Germany,” Tulane European and Civil Law Forum 78 (2004). Alfredo Coll and Sergio Doncel, “Freedom of Speech in American and Spanish Law: A Comparative Perspective,” www.works.bepress.com/alfredo_coll/1 (accessed 28 July 2016).

Spain Constitutional Court Judgment No. 235/2007, of November 7. www.tribunalconstitucional.es/es/jurisprudencia/restrad/Paginas/JCC2352007en.aspx (accessed 30 May 2012).

Pablo Salvador Coderch and Antoni Rubí Puig,, “Genocide Denial and Freedom of Speech: Comments on the Spanish Constitutional Court’s Judgment 235/2007, November 7th”, in Dret. Revista Para el Análisis del Derecho 4 (2008).

Enrique Guillen Lopez, “Judicial Review in Spain: The Constitutional Court,” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 41: 529 (2008).

Jose Rodriguez Jiménez, “Antisemitism and the Extreme Right in Spain (1962-1997),” www.sicsa.huji.ac.il (accessed 24 April 2012).

Case of Violeta Friedman, No 101/90, Judgment of November 11, 1991.

Spain Constitutional Court Judgment No. 235/2007, of November 7, para 5.

Michael Whine, “Expanding Holocaust denial and Legislation against it,” Jewish Political Studies Review 20:1-2(2008).

Declaration of the Rights of Man – 1789, www.avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/rightsof.asp (accessed 21 May 2012).

Article 4 and 11of the Declaration of the Rights of Man.

Article 34 of the French Constitution.

Sévane Garibian, “Taking Denial Seriously: Genocide Denial and Freedom of Speech in French Law,” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 9:479 (2008).

Vivian Curran, "Balancing Freedom of Expression and Human Rights in France,” www.jurist.org/forum/2012/02/vivian-curran-genocide-denial.php (accessed 30 May 2012).

Josephs Jonathan, “Holocaust Denial Legislation,” Working Papers du Centre Perelman de philosophie du droit 3 (2008).

Lyombe Eko, “New Medium, Old Free Speech Regimes: The Historical and Ideological Foundations of French & American Regulation of Bias-Motivated Speech and Symbolic Expression on the Internet,” Loyola. Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review 28:69 (2006).

Richard H. Weisberg, Vichy Law and the Holocaust in France (Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publisher, 1996).

Peter Carrier, Holocaust Monuments and the National Memory Cultures in France and Germany since 1989 (New York:Berghahn Books, 2005).

Roger Cohen, “France Confronts its Jews, and Itself,” New York Times, 19 October 1997.

UEJF & LICRA v. Yahoo! Inc., Tribunal de grande instance [T.G.I.] [Superior Court] Paris, May 22, 2000, The Clerk of the Chief Justice Christine Bensoam, (Fr.), available at www.juriscom.net/txt/jurisfr/cti/yauctions20000522.htm.

www.senat.fr/basile/visio.do?id=d45186620120123_8&idtable=d136282-72330_3|d45186620120123_8&_c=Genocide+bill&rch=ds&de=20110527&au=20120527&dp=1+an&radio=dp&aff=36282&tri=p&off=0&afd=ppr&afd=ppl&afd=pjl&afd=cvn#eltSign7 (accessed 31 May 2012).

Michel Troper, “La loi Gayssot et la constitution,” Annale. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 54(6) (1999).

Yahoo! II, 379 F.3d 1120, 1126-1127 (9th Cir. 2004).

ECtHR 7 July 2003, Case No. 65831/01, Garaudy v. France; ICCPR 8 November 1996, Case No 550/1993, Robert Faurisson v. France.

http://www.senat.fr/lng/en/index.html

Balancing Freedom of Expression and Human Rights in France, www.jurist.org/forum/2012/02/vivian-curran-genocide-denial.php (accessed 12 June 2012).

John Wolf, Harnessing the Holocaust: the Politics of Memory in France (Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003).

http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/11/dossiers/genocide.asp (assecced 30 June 30 2017).

David Fraser, “Law’s Holocaust Denial: State Memory, Legality,” in Ludovic Hennebel and Tomas Hochmann (eds), “Genocide Denials and the Law,”(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).

www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/conseil-constitutionnel/english/case-law/decision/decision-no-2012-647-dc-of-28-february-2012.114637.html

www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2011/12/19/2003521130 (accessed 29 June 2015).

www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-14/end-france-s-block-on-turkey-s-eu-bid-president-hollande.html (accessed 28 June 2015).

www.edition.cnn.com/2012/01/23/world/europe/france-armenia-genocide/index.html (accessed 24 May 2012).

Décision № 2016-745 DC du Conseilconstitutionnel du 26 janvier 2017.

Downloads

Published

2016-11-15

How to Cite

Gzoyan, E. (2016). Genocide Denial under Constitutional Law: Comparative analysis of Spain, Germany and France. International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies, 3(1), 72–87. Retrieved from http://agmipublications.am/index.php/ijags/article/view/36