Historical Analogy and Political Continuity as Technologies of Power. The Armenian Genocide and Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Interrelation in the Contemporary Armenian Politics





Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Armenian Genocide, politics of memory, technologies of power, historical analogies, continuity


Analyses of the transformation and political change in Armenia pays noticeable attention to the dominant role of discourses of the Armenian Genocide and the conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh for nation and state-building processes. At the same time, the two issues usually are investigated separately. Attempts are rarely made to interpret the interrelation and connection between the two narratives. Nevertheless, the trauma-based discourse of memory is linking the two narratives as technology of power through discursive structures/mechanisms of analogy and continuity. Methods of discourse analysis combined with expert interviews, internet questionnaires and ethnographic field research aim to analyse the crucial discursive patterns and mechanisms. Hypothetically, instrumentalized and ideological usage of combined narratives are impacting the political changes, in Post-Soviet Armenia. The article touches upon only one aspect of the discursive interrelation between the Armenian Genocide and the Nagorno-Karabakh issue. Thus, the subject under the question is the impact of theusage of historical analogy and the idea of continuity understand as technologies on contemporary Armenian politics of memory.


Maria Koinova, “Diaspora Coalition-Building for Genocide Recognition: Armenians, Assyrians and Kurds,” Ethnic and Racial Studies 42, no. 11 (2019): 1-21.

Ronald Grigor Suny, “They Can Live in the Desert but Nowhere Else”: A History of the Armenian Genocide (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017); Taner Akçam, A Shameful Act: The Armenian Genocide and the Question of Turkish Responsibility (New York, NY: Picador, 2007).

Cathie Carmichael, Genocide before the Holocaust (New Haven: Yale University, 2009).

Donald E. Miller and Lorna Touryan Miller, Survivors: An Oral History of the Armenian Genocide (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999).

Thomas de Waal, “The G-Word: The Armenian Massacre and the Politics of Genocide,” Foreign Affairs 94, no. 1 (2015): 136-48.

Vartan Matiossian, The Politics of Naming the Armenian Genocide. Language, History and ‘Medz Yeghern’ (New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021).

Levon Chorbajian, The Making of Nagorno-Karabagh - From Secession to Republic (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).

Laurence Broers, “‘From Frozen Conflict’ to Enduring Rivalry: Reassessing the Nagorny Karabakh Conflict,” Nationalities Papers 43, no. 4 (2015): 556-576.

Ohannes Geukjian, Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in the South Caucasus: Nagorno-Karabakh and the Legacy of Soviet Nationalities Policy (New York: Routledge, 2016).

Claude Mutafian, “The Karabagh in Twentieth Century,” in Caucasian Knot: The History and Geopolitics of Nagorno-Karabagh, ed. Levon Chorbajian, Patrick Donabedian, and Claude Mutafian (London: Zed Books, 1994).2001.

Geukjian, Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict; Vicken Cheterian, “The Uses and Abuses of History: Genocide and the Making of the Karabakh Conflict,” Europe-Asia Studies 70, no. 6 (2018): 884-903.

Victor A. Shnirelman, The Value of the Past: Myths, Identity and Politics in Transcaucasia, Senri Ethnological Studies 57 (Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology, 2001).

Harutyun Marutyan, Iconography of Armenian Identity: The Memory of Genocide and the Karabagh Movement (Yerevan: Gitut'yun Publishing House, 2009).

Henry E. Hale, Patronal Politics: Eurasian Regime Dynamics In Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).

Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (New York: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2015).

The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, eds. John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson (New York: Routledge, 2017).

Marianne W. Jorgensen and Louise Phillips, Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method, (London, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2002).

Alexander Bogner, Beate Littig, and Wolfgang Menz, “Introduction: Expert Interviews - An Introduction to a New Methodological Debate,” in Interviewing Experts, ed. Alexander Bogner, Beate Littig, and Wolfgang Menz, Research Methods Series (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2009), 1-13.

Stefanie Döringer, “‘The Problem-Centred Expert Interview’. Combining Qualitative Interviewing Approaches for Investigating Implicit Expert Knowledge,” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 24, no. 3 (2020): 1-14.

D. Soyini Madison, Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance (Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2011).

Sarah Pink, Doing Visual Ethnography (London, Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2006).

Marcus Banks, “Doing Things with Photographs and Films,” in Visual Methods in Social Research (London: Sage, 2001).

Marcus Banks, “Visual Anthropology is not Just Ethnographic Film: The Visual as Material Culture,” in Visual Research Methods, ed. Peter Hamilton (London: Sage, 2006).

Michael Angrosino, Obserwacja w Nowym Kontekście. Etnografia, Pedagogika i Rozwój Problematyki Społecznej, trans. Filip Rogalski, vol. 2 (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2010).

Alexander Iskandaryan, “Armenian-Turkish Rapprochement: Timing Matters,” Insight Turkey 11, no. 3 (2009): 37-44.

Julie Fedor, “Memory, Kinship, and the Mobilization of the Dead: The Russian State and the ‘Immortal Regiment” Movement,’” in War and Memory in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus, ed. Julie Fedor et al., Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017), 307-345.

Benjamin Forest and Juliet Johnson, “Monumental Politics: Regime Type and Public Memory in Post-Communist States,” Post-Soviet Affairs 27, no. 3 (2011): 269-288.

Kiril Stanilov, The Post-Socialist City: Urban Form and Space Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe after Socialism (Dordrecht: Springer, 2010).

Clive Gray, The Politics of Museums (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015); Museums and Sites of Persuasion: Politics, Memory and Human Rights,eds. Joyce Apsel, Amy Sodaro (London, New York: Routledge, 2019).

Malkhaz Toria, “Between Traditional and Modern Museology. Exhibiting National History in the Museum of Georgia,” in Museums and Sites of Persuasion. Politics, Memory and Human Rights (London, New York: Routledge, 2020), 39-55.

Gayane Shagoyan, “Between Memory and Memorial: Anastas Mikoyan and ‘Social Lustration’ in Armenia,” Caucasus Analytical Digest 80 (2016): 2-5.

Andrzej Szpociński, “Miejsca Pamięci (Lieux de Memoire),” Teksty Drugie 4 (2008): 11-20; Pierre Nora, “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux Des Memoires,” Representations 26 (1989): 7-24.

Paul Ricœur, Pamięć, Historia, Zapomnienie, trans. Janusz Margański (Kraków: UNIVERSITAS, 2012), 252-253.

Richard G. Hovannisian, “The Armenian Question in the Ottoman Empire 1876-1914,” in The Armenian People from Ancient to Modern Times. Foreign Dominion to Statehood: The Fifteenth Century to Twentieth Century, ed. Richard G. Hovannisian, vol. II (London: Macmillan, 1997), 203-238.

Patrick Gore, Tis Some Poor Fellow’s Skull: Post-Soviet Warfare in the Southern Caucasus (iUniverse, 2008), 17-18.

Razmik Panossian, The Armenians: From Kings and Priests to Merchants and Commissars (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006), 251.

Christopher J. Walker, Armenia: The Survival of a Nation (London: Croom Helm, 1980), 254-255.

Razmik Panossian, “The Past as Nation. Three Dimensions of Armenian Identity,” Geopolitics 7, no. 2 (2002): 132.

Robert Axelrod and Larissa Forster, “How Historical Analogies in Newspapers of Five Countries Make Sense of Major Events: 9/11, Mumbai and Tahrir Square,” Research in Economics 71, no. 1 (2017): 8-19.

Paul Bartha, “Analogy and Analogical Reasoning,” in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta (2019).

Peter J. Dortmans and Eleanor Eiffe, “An Examination of Future Scenarios Using Historical Analogy,” Futures 36, no. 10 (2004): 1049-1462.

James Ferguson, “Proletarian Politics Today: On the Perils and Possibilities of Historical Analogy,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 61, no. 1 (2019): 4-22.

Hall Gardner, IR Theory, Historical Analogy, and Major Power War (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019).

Djouaria Ghilani et al., “Looking Forward to the Past: An Interdisciplinary Discussion on the Use of Historical Analogies and Their Effects,” Memory Studies 10, no. 3 (2017): 274-285.

Yahya Kamali and Sedighe Sheikhzadeh Jooshani, “Reasoning in Foreign Policy Making from the Analogy Perspective: The Case Study of Iran’s Nuclear Issue,” Asian Politics & Policy 11, no. 2 (2019): 208-226.

Andrew Mumford, “Parallels, Prescience and the Past: Analogical Reasoning and Contemporary International Politics,” International Politics 52, no. 1 (2015): 1-19.

Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976, trans. David Macey, vol. V, Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976 (London: Picador, 2003).

Michel Foucault, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977--1978, trans. Graham Burchell, (New York: Picador, 2009).

Michel Foucault, The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978--1979 (New York: Picador, 2010).

Monika Bobako, Islamofobia Jako Technologia Władzy. Studium z Antropologii Politycznej (Kraków: UNIVERSITAS, 2017), 47.

Nikolas Rose, Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 52.

Cheterian, “The Uses and Abuses of History”; Ceylan Tokluoglu, “The Political Discourse of the Azerbaijani Elite on the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict (1991-2009),” Europe-Asia Studies 63, no. 7 (2011): 1223-1252.

Sven Eliaeson, Lyudmila Harutyunyan, and Larissa Titarenko, After the Soviet Empire: Legacies and Pathways (Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2015).

Nora Dudwick, “Political Transformations in Postcommunist Armenia: Images and Realities,” in Conflict, Cleavage, and Change in Central Asia and the Caucasus, ed. Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).

Nora C Dudwick, “Memory, Identity and Politics in Armenia,” (PhD, 1994), 1-476.

Transcaucasia, Nationalism, and Social Change: Essays in the History of Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, ed. Ronald Suny (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996).

Donnacha Ó Ó Beacháin and Abel Polese, The Colour Revolutions in the Former Soviet Republics: Successes and Failures (London and New York: Routledge, 2010).

Alexander Agadjanian, Ansgar Jödicke, and Evert van der Zweerde, Religion, Nation and Democracy in the South Caucasus (London and New York: Routledge, 2014).

Taras Kuzio, “Transition in Post-Communist States: Triple or Quadruple?” Politics 21, no. 3 (2001): 168-77.

Hale, Patronal Politics; Evgeny Finkel and Yitzhak M. Brudny, “No More Colour! Authoritarian Regimes and Colour Revolutions in Eurasia,” Democratization 19, no. 1 (2012): 1-14.




How to Cite

Krzysztan, B. (2022). Historical Analogy and Political Continuity as Technologies of Power. The Armenian Genocide and Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Interrelation in the Contemporary Armenian Politics. International Journal of Armenian Genocide Studies, 6(2), 6–39. https://doi.org/10.51442/ijags.0021